Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Blankenship

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 30, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hurt

— Overruling motion to docket, advance and determine case.

At the regular primary election held in August, 1917, 5. E. Bennett, L. B. Tichenor, Guy E. Robertson, Ozna Schultz, Newton R. Baize, J. R. Weller, D. Melvin Stewart, J. S. Glenn, Joe Smith, R. C. Tichenor, J. T. Hagerman, B. W. Taylor, Isaac Keown, and J. S. Wilson, whom for convenience we will call appellants, respectively, received a'nomination of the Democratic party for a county office, or an office of a district, of Ohio county. Certain ones, of them, did not have any opposition for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pendergest v. HeekinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  2. Matthews v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  3. Elizabethtown, Railroad v. Ashland, Street Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  4. St. Bernard Coal Co. v. Pittsburg Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  5. Zornes v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Olive Hill Fire Brick Co. v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Hollingsworth v. AveyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API