Poyntz v. Shackelford
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 88 — ON MOTION TO REINSTATE AN INJUNCTION ON MOTION TO REINSTATE INJUNCTION. (No briefs on file on either side.)
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE 'HAZELRIGG
delivered the opinion of the court.
By averments to -the effect that they were the rightful Board of Election Commissioners, selected and appointed in pursuance of the provisions of the present election law, (section 1596a, Kentucky Statutes), and that the defendant Shackelford, clerk, was about to qualify his co-defendants, Mackoy and Cochran, as members of that board, and the *547latter were about to enter upon the discharge of their alleged duties as such members, and thus interfere with the rightful possession of the office and discharge of its duties by them, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weaver v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Purnell v. MannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
- City of Huntington v. CastIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Braidy v. TherittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Shelley v. McCulloughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Sibert v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Pratt v. BreckinridgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Rouse v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Callaghan v. TobinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.