Mattern v. Herzog
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
The Court of Civil Appeals has reversed a District Court’s summary decree and held that a clause of Paragraph II of the last will and testament of Monika Mattern is invalid because it violates the rule against perpetuities and constitutes an unlawful restraint upon alienation. 359 S.W.2d 86. The clause in question purported to give Chris Mattern, a child of the testatrix, the right to purchase certain real estate from the other beneficiaries named in the will. We have reached the conclusion that this option clause is not invalid as held by the Court of Civil Appeals and we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barton v. ThawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Neely v. BrogdenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Rust v. RustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Kershner v. HurlburtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Kelly v. WomackTexas Supreme Court · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Hysaw v. DawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Sonny Arnold, Inc. v. Sentry Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Marguerite Hoffman v. David MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Bagby v. BredthauerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Procter v. Foxmeyer Drug Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.