Marguerite Hoffman v. David Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises out of the sale and public re-sale by auction of a well-known Mark Rothko painting. The painting’s original owner, Marguerite Hoffman, argues that she was fraudulently induced into selling the painting with assurances of secrecy and that the eventual public re-sale of the painting constituted a breach of a confidentiality provision in her agreement with the original buyer. For the reasons described below, we AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant L & M Arts on Hoffman’s fraudulent inducement claim,' AFFIRM…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Dorsey v. Portfolio Equities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Apache Corporation v. W & T Offshore, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Chad Richardson v. Omaha School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- IAS Servs. Grp., L.L.C. v. Jim Buckley & Assocs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Feld Motor Sports, Inc. v. Traxxas, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Sprint Nextel Corporation v. Wireless Buybacks HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.