Legal Opinion

Ritchey v. Cedar Mill Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1900No. 3559PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County.— Hon. Frank T. Reid, Judge.

1Per curiam

Motion to dismiss appeal for want of sufficiency of the bond. The appeal bond was conditioned, also, as a stay bond. It is conceded that the amount of the bond is not twice the amount of the judgment and costs and $200, the statutory requirement for an appeal bond. This brings the case within the rule announced in Pierce v. Willeby, 20 Wash. 129 (54 Pac. 999); Town of Sumner v. Rogers, 21 Wash. 361 (58 Pac. 214); Galloway v. *512Tjossem, ante, p. 103 (60 Pac. 129), and Beezley v. Sessions, ante, p. 125 (60 Pac. 130). The appellants have filed a very earnest brief, in which the court is adjured,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. WillebyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Town of Sumner v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Beezley v. SessionsWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Galloway v. TjossemWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Washington Water Power Co. v. Abacus Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API