Guthrie v. Mitchell Et Vir.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garvin County; B. McMillan, Judge. Action by Susie Mitchell and husband against W. M. Guthrie. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant 'brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This proceeding in error is to review the judgment rendered in an action wherein the defendant in error, Susie Mitchell, joined by her husband, J. F. Mitchell, as plaintiffs, sued the plaintiff in error, W. M. Guthrie, her father, as defendant, for the recovery of reni;s and profits alleged to have -been received by him while she was a minor and in his custody and caro from certain lands allotted to her as a member of the Choctaw Tribe of Indians. The parties will hereafter be referred to in the manner in which they appeared in the lower court.
1. No objection was made in the trial court that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ShuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Greenville National Bank v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
- Doe ex dem. Farmer's Heirs v. EslavaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- IN THE MATTER OF M.K.T.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Henson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Marks v. ForemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.