Legal Opinion

Vigil v. California Casualty Insurance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1991No. 18837PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the individual medical payments coverages for two or more automobiles under one or more insurance policies may be “stacked.” The issue is not quite one of first impression, because we recently held in Sanchez v. Herrera, 109 N.M. 155, 783 P.2d 465 (1989), that the medical payments provisions under the separate policies in that case could not be stacked, based on an unambiguous exclusionary clause in each policy. In the present case — in which the policies lack an exclusionary clause — we reach the opposite result, based on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Sanchez v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Lopez Ex Rel. Estate of Lopez v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Windsor InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Slack v. RobinsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Casias v. Continental Casualty Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Montano v. Allstate Indemnity Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. ACE Fire Underwriters Insurance v. Romero Ex Rel. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API