Legal Opinion
FROF, INC. v. Harris
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 17, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-2384PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
I have before me defendant Roger Maggio’s motion to vacate a default judgment and dismiss the plaintiffs complaint. For the following reasons, I will grant the motion in part and deny it in part.
I. Factual Background
The present case results from two actions in this court in the early 1980’s. Those actions involved security claims by a number of investors against various Cable/Tel Corporations and their officers and directors. Defendants Maggio and Harris in the present case were officers and/or directors of the Cable/Tel Corporations and were parties in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Eli L. Medunic and Dolores M. Medunic v. Louis W. LedererCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Yanci Dupree v. Burtell JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Brand Jewelers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Oltremari Ex Rel. McDaniel v. Kansas Social & Rehabilitative ServiceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Roland v. Branch Banking & Trust CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Cales v. WillsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Ali v. Mid-Atlantic Settlement Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.