Cal-Farm Insurance Companies v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), J.
This is a controversy between two liability insurance companies regarding their respective obligations to pay an agreed $75,000 in damages to an injured third party and defense costs. We agree with the trial judge that Fireman’s Fund should win the argument.
Cal-Farm Insurance Companies, a corporation (referred to as “Cal-Farm”) acknowledges that its policy covers the defendants in the personal injury suit. It assumed defense of the third party personal injury suit on behalf of all the defendants. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, a corporation, a member of Fireman’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Argonaut Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Atlantic National Insurance v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- National Indemnity Co. v. ManleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Pamela Siino v. Foresters Life Insurance and Annuity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Lovy v. State Farm Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Powell v. Premier InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.