Legal Opinion
Stepho v. Allstate Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 29, 1989No. S89G0064PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, Presiding Justice.
Stephen Stepho owned a pick-up truck insured by Allstate. The policy excluded liability for injury to any person related by blood to the insured and residing in insured’s house. Stephen’s adult son, Saad Stepho, was a named insured on the policy. Saad was authorized to use Stephen’s truck. Stephen’s 14-year-old son Nashwan, a passenger in the truck driven by Saad, was injured in an accident.
Stephen, on behalf of Nashwan, brought an action against Saad and against Allstate. Disputing coverage on the basis of the family exclusion provision, Allstate moved for summary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. NeeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Geico v. DickeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Southern Guaranty Insurance v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- SOUTHEASTERN FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ChaneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
3Cited by39 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Cimarron Insurance Co. v. CroyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Smalls v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ballard Ex Rel. BallardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.