Legal Opinion
O'Hara v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 9, 1955PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPiper, J.
Plaintiff-appellant brought this action for false arrest and malicious prosecution against defendants-respondents Elmer G. Zimmerman and John D. Hanrahan who are police officers of the City of Buffalo. The city was not made a party to the action. The complaint had been dismissed upon the ground that no notice of claim was filed similar to that required by section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. If the action were ¡against the City of Buffalo, such a notice would have been required under section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. Such notice would be served only upon the municipality and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School District No. 3New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Kosiba v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Feisthamel v. RoczenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Gwydir v. CowdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Krauss v. LaymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
3Cited by17 opinions
- Regan v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Laverne v. CorningDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Sorge v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Widger v. Central School District No. 1 of Towns of EllicottvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Alifieris v. American Airlines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.