Feisthamel v. Roczen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Memorandum: Coneededly, the recovery in this action is based upon the negligent operation of a police patrol car by a police officer of the City of Utica, who, at the time of the accident, was acting in the performance of his duties and within the scope of his employment. The City of Utica was not made a party to the action. The complaint fails to allege filing with the city *938comptroller, or a corresponding officer, and with the defendant, of the notices required by section 50-c of the General Municipal.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Derlicka v. LeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Kosiba v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Gwydir v. CowdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Krauss v. LaymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spiegel v. SchulmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- O'Hara v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Rusch v. KarpickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Griffo v. TaurielloNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Siegel v. EpsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964