Legal Opinion

Westfeldt Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 9, 1956No. C. D. 1760PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge;

The merchandise involved in this case consists of a main altar and parts, a communion rail, 2 side altars, 14 stations of the cross, statuary, woodenware, and candelabra, imported from Italy in January and February 1949. It arrived in three shipments and was covered by three separate entries, each in the name of West-feldt Brothers, as importer of record, for the account of Bernardini Studios. According to the declarations of the nominal consignee, Bernardini Studios is the actual owner for customs purposes. The merchandise was entered free of duty under paragraph 1774 of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Brown & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  4. Hammerstein v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  5. Nat E. Berzen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thalson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Pollard Bearings Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  3. Marubeni-Iida (America), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Joseph Poli Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  5. Joseph Poli Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API