Legal Opinion

State v. Klinck

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1989No. 88-630PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrey, J.

Effective July 1, 1976, the Ohio General Assembly adopted Am. Sub. H.B. No. 300 (136 Ohio Laws, Part II, 2311) to comprehensively revise Ohio’s drug abuse prevention and control laws and to bring them into conformity with the Federal Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (“federal Act”).

The provisions of Ohio’s Uniform Controlled Substances Act (“Ohio Act”), R.C. Chapter 3719, parallel those of the federal Act, codified at Section 801 et seq., Title 21, U.S. Code.

R.C. 3719.43 delegates quasi-legislative authority to the Attorney General of the United States, as follows:

*109“W…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. WickhamOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Cleveland v. PiskuraOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State ex rel. Brockman v. ProctorOhio Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CollierOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. SamatarOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. HiattOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. FryeOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. In re JamesOhio Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API