Legal Opinion

State v. Lipscomb

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 12, 1971No. 41779PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal from a judgment of conviction and denial of a motion for a new trial after a guilty verdict on a charge of aggravated assault, Minn. St. 1967, § 609.225, subd. 1. Defendant contends that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict; that the trial court erred in permitting impeachment of defendant by the introduction of evidence of prior misdemeanor convictions; and that the court erred in denying a new trial on a showing that the testimony of a state’s witness was coerced and false.

From the record it appears that about 2 a. m. on February 18, 1968, the victim, Charles…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. State v. EllingsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Kaehler v. KaehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. State v. KlotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. State v. DamlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BowlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. City of St. Paul v. DiBucciSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Belanger v. Warren Consolidated School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API