State v. Daml
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of first-degree robbery, Minn. St. 1961, § 619.42. Defendant contends that the court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the effect of a witness’ prior inconsistent statement and that the verdict is not supported by the record.
From the record it appears that the jury could find that defendant and his companion, one Roger Childs, at between 2 and 2:30 a. m. on June 20, 1963, were driving in the vicinity of the Clark gas station on University Avenue in southeast Minneapolis. They stopped about a block from the station, at which time defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. DeZelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. LossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. EllingsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.