Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ideal Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. MacKowiak

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1924No. 11,679Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Nichols, J.

I do not agree with the conclusion reached by the majority of the court. There is no averment in the complaint that appellee was employed in the operation of calender rolls in laundry machinery, and unless she was so employed, she was not unlawfully employed. The complaint avers that at the time of her injury appellee was operating "a mangle which is a machine used by defendant in its place of business to iron articles by machinery, and is a laundry machine, consisting with other parts, of a projecting shelf in the nature of a table and a revolving cylinder or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. PedigoIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Jones v. Cincinnati Type Foundry Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Eagle Iron Co. v. BaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Kenyon v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Talge Mahogany Co. v. BurrowsIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API