Meligakes v. Meligakes
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldbige, J.,
A reading of the record in this divorce action convinces us, as it did the court below, that the appellant failed to establish by clear, satisfactory and preponderant evidence that he is entitled to be relieved of his marital obligations: LaClair v. LaClair, 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 471, 194 A. 224.
The parties were mai’ried February 14, 1919, and lived together without any serious differences until the beginning of the year 1928. The husband was then conducting a business in Gettysburg which consisted of operating a soda fountain, selling books, magazines, cards, etc.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
- Sleight v. SleightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Laclair v. LaclairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Welsh v. WelshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Orsuto v. OrsutoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Wilson v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Seashore Realty & Investment Co. v. La Junta de Planificación de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- Celia v. CeliaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949