Wilson v. Wilson

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

This divorce action was instituted by the husband alleging indignities. The master recommended the libel be dismissed, and the court below overruled libellant’s exceptions and refused a decree.

Both the master and the lower court found the respondent’s conduct sufficient to constitute indignities, but held that libellant did not prove that he was the injured and innocent spouse.

We have made a careful and independent examination of the evidence and reach the same conclusion.

The parties were married in 1932. Three children were born; one lived five years; and the other two…