Legal Opinion

Celia v. Celia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1949No. Appeal, 34PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

Our examination and review of the record in this divorce proceeding forces us to the conclusion that the master, who recommended a decree, and the learned court below, which approved the master’s report and entered the decree, could have done so only in utter disregard of the testimony of the three adult children of the couple.

Libellant and respondent were married in Italy in 1909 and lived together in Philadelphia from 1913 until they separated April 13, 1940. He was 61 years of age and she was 58 when the libel was filed. Six children were born of the marriage, three…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  3. Langeland v. LangelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Verbeck v. VerbeckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Daly v. DalySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wasson v. WassonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Politylo v. PolityloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. McGuigan v. McGuiganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Arnold v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Quieti v. QuietiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API