Brasseler U.S.A., I, L.P. v. Stryker Sales Corp.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDENFIELD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this patent-infringement case, the accused infringers — defendants Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation (collectively, Stryker) — successfully raised 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)’s “on-sale” defense. Stryker, claimed that plaintiff Brasseler, U.S.A. I, L.P.’s (Brasseler’s) patent for surgical saw blades is invalid because the blades’ inventors sold them — in violation of § 102(b)' — more than one year before Brasseler filed its patent application.
Brasseler insisted that no such sale occurred. Because the evidence showed that it did, the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- GJR Investments, Inc. v. County of EscambiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Key Pharmaceuticals v. Hercon Laboratories CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Fmc Corporation v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Critikon, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brasseler, U.S.A. I, L.P. v. Stryker Sales Corporation and Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Levenger Co. v. FeldmanDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- Sightsound. Com Inc. v. N2K, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003