Legal Opinion

Brasseler U.S.A., I, L.P. v. Stryker Sales Corp.

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided December 30, 1999No. CV 497-184PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDENFIELD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this patent-infringement case, the accused infringers — defendants Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation (collectively, Stryker) — successfully raised 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)’s “on-sale” defense. Stryker, claimed that plaintiff Brasseler, U.S.A. I, L.P.’s (Brasseler’s) patent for surgical saw blades is invalid because the blades’ inventors sold them — in violation of § 102(b)' — more than one year before Brasseler filed its patent application.

Brasseler insisted that no such sale occurred. Because the evidence showed that it did, the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. GJR Investments, Inc. v. County of EscambiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Key Pharmaceuticals v. Hercon Laboratories CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Fmc Corporation v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Critikon, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brasseler, U.S.A. I, L.P. v. Stryker Sales Corporation and Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Levenger Co. v. FeldmanDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
  3. Sightsound. Com Inc. v. N2K, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API