Legal Opinion

United States v. Matagrin

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 13, 1911No. 54PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7015 (T. D. 30571).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The importation consisted of paper boxes containing leather gloves. The gloves were assessed at specific rates of duty bji the dozen pairs, and the boxes were assessed at 45 per cent ad valorem as paper boxes under paragraph 418 of the tariff act of 1909, under a construction of the Treasury Department first promulgated in T. D. 29963 and reaffirmed in T. D. 30046, which construed the last proviso of section 195 as intending to impose a duty upon containers of the character here involved. The board held these containers not to be dutiable, and from this decision the Government appeals.

*310The two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. United States v. WhitridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. United States v. WigglesworthU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1842

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Goat & Sheepskin Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. United States v. Wolff & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Wright v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. United States v. RingkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. Stroheim v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API