Fox v. State

The sole issue on this appeal is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary which has three elements: (1) An inten tional entry; (2) made without consent of the owner; and (3) with an intent to steal. It is not here contended that the evidence does not establish that there was an intentional entry, without consent and with intent to steal. Rather it is contended that the evidence does not establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant and his companion, Landerman, were the ones who made the entry and…