Legal Opinion

Dalo v. Thalmann

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 13, 2005No. 2003-403-AppealPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case came before the Supreme Court on May 10, 2005, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties, we are satisfied that cause has not been shown. Accordingly, we shall decide the appeal at this time. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

On February 18, 1991, defendants, Mark Stepanian (Stepanian) and Judy Thalmann (defendant or Thalmann), then husband and wife, executed a promissory note (note) payable…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Rotelli v. CatanzaroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. State v. GrayhurstSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  4. United Lending Corp. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  5. Harris v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simcha Berman v. Laura Sitrin, in her capacity as Finance Director for the City of NewportSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  2. Lett v. GiulianoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  3. Merchants Bank v. HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  4. Cic-Newport Associates v. LeeSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  5. Hammond v. RosewellSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API