Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2002No. 38213PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this matter, we are asked by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to answer two certified questions:

1. In applying Supreme Court Rule 182 to an employee of a represented corporation, does Nevada apply the portion of the commentary to Model Rule 4.2 barring ex parte contact with an employee “whose statement may constitute an admission on the part of the organization”?

2. If so, does Nevada interpret that portion of the commentary by analogy to Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(D), by application of agency principles, or by a different analysis?

These questions concern the…

3Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Weeks v. Independent School District No. I-89Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. In Re Discipline of SchaeferNevada Supreme Court · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011
  2. Dena Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd., a Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Waid v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Snider v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. American Sports Radio Network, Inc. v. Krause (In Re Krause)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API