Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this matter, we are asked by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to answer two certified questions:
1. In applying Supreme Court Rule 182 to an employee of a represented corporation, does Nevada apply the portion of the commentary to Model Rule 4.2 barring ex parte contact with an employee “whose statement may constitute an admission on the part of the organization”?
2. If so, does Nevada interpret that portion of the commentary by analogy to Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(D), by application of agency principles, or by a different analysis?
These questions concern the…
3Cases cited26 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Weeks v. Independent School District No. I-89Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Discipline of SchaeferNevada Supreme Court · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- Jackson v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- Dena Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd., a Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Waid v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Snider v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- American Sports Radio Network, Inc. v. Krause (In Re Krause)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.