Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 27, 1931No. Docket No. 6751PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, P. J.
The complaint in this action purports to state two causes of action, each designed to recover on one of two policies of life insurance. We shall treat the controversy, in our discussion of it, as if there were but one cause of action, as the questions presented by the appeal are identical as to each of the two alleged causes.
Among other things it is alleged in the pleading of plaintiffs that Mary Meyer is administratrix of the estate of Hazel Edna Johnson, deceased, and the guardian of Robert William Paul, all as stated in the title to the action; that Robert Paul is a minor, the only living…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Schmidt v. Northern Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Supreme Lodge Knights & Ladies of Honor v. MenkhausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States v. WeightmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Freeman v. LindSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Beck v. West Coast Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- West Coast Life Insurance v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Beck v. DowneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- McGowan v. McGowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. StrauchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.