Asheville Associates, Inc. v. Miller
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
Courts generally refuse to enforce restrictive covenants in employment contracts unless they are (1) in writing, (2) entered into at the time and as a part of the contract of employment, (3) based on valuable considerations, (4) reasonable both as to time and territory embraced in the restrictions, (5) fair to the parties, and (6) not against public policy.
The contracts here involved are in writing. They were found to have been entered into as a part of the contracts of employment. The mutual agreements in these contracts were sufficient considerations to support the obligations undertaken.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Welcome Wagon International, Inc. v. PenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Sonotone Corp. v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Delmar Studios of the Carolinas, Inc. v. GoldstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Thompson v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
3Cited by19 opinions
- United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- James S. Kemper & Co. v. Cox & AssociatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- James C. Greene Company v. KelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Harwell Enterprises, Inc. v. HeimSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.