Legal Opinion

Harwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Heim

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1970No. 11PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

In passing upon the demurrer this Court must accept as true the facts alleged. Hence, for the present hearing these facts are deemed established: (1) Plaintiff is engaged in various business endeavors including all phases of silk screen processing, plastics, importing and various other ventures throughout the United States; (2) the parties entered into a written contract which provided, inter alia, that Heim would not engage in any business competitive with the plaintiff in the United States for a period of two years after termination of his employment with the plaintiff; (3) Heim voluntarily…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O. & W. Thum Co. v. TloczynskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Beam v. . RutledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Powers Film Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Sineath v. . KatzisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Sineath v. KatzisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Hartman v. WH Odell and Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
  4. Bendinger v. Marshalltown Trowell Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Precision Walls, Inc. v. ServieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API