Thompson v. Turner
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
Defendant’s brief, after listing forty-one assignments of error composed of forty-two exceptions, says: “All of the assignments of error heretofore listed and brought forward are insisted upon, but we especially invite the Court’s attention to the following:” Eight assignments of error are then listed as meriting special attention.
We do not deem it necessary to deal separately with the designated assignments of error consisting of motions to nonsuit and exceptions to the charge. We understand them to present two legal questions.
The first question is: Have plaintiffs alleged and proved a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Kramer v. . OldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Maola Ice Cream Co. v. Maola Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Moskin Bros. Inc. v. SwartzbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Sonotone Corp. v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beverage Systems of the Carolinas, LLC v. Associated Beverage Repair, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- Jewel Box Stores Corporation v. MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- James C. Greene Company v. KelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Asheville Associates, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Walter Turner Coffee Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.