Legal Opinion
Sheridan v. Cadet Chemical Corporation
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 8, 1963No. FILE Nos. 29119, 29120, 29121PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLongo, J.
The above-named actions are the forerunners of many similar actions instituted as the aftermath of an explosion occurring on April 3, 1962, in Norwich, Connecticut. The complaint in each action alleges that the defendant Cadet Chemical Corporation manufactured and packaged chemical substances which it sold to the defendant McKesson and Robbins, Inc., who instructed the manufacturer to ship the chemicals to the warehouse of the Van Tassel Leather Company, one of several defendants, in Norwich, for storage. The Cadet Chemical Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, loaded the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. MenefeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Amsel v. BrooksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Atkins v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Phillips v. Anchor Hocking Glass CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Elizabeth Taylor v. Portland Paramount CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Electric Regulator Corp. v. Sterling Extruder Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- Hitt v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1975
- Roland v. Modell's Shoppers World of Bergen Cty.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.