Legal Opinion

Jakobsen v. Peratis

California Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 11267PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action to quiet title, brought by plaintiff, holder of a tax deed dated July 11, 1927, executed by N. T. Powell, city treasurer of Los Angeles, against defendant, the former owner of the property. The proceedings leading up to the execution of the deed were taken under the Street Improvement Act of 1911 (Deering’s General Laws [1923, and Supp.], Act 8199). The trial court gave judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Defendant contends that the deed was void for lack of compliance with certain provisions of the statute, and we see no escape from this conclusion. The principal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Landregan v. PeppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Reed v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Colkins v. DoolittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Orange County Flood Control District v. Sunny Crest Dairy, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Keeble v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Burkett v. Dental Perfection Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API