Hornstein v. Yarrington
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JARMAN, C.
The defendant, Hornstein, owned a bulldog which the plaintiff Barrington, alleges was of a vicious and dangerous character and disposition, which was well known to the defendant and that said dog was kept by the defendant at the same place where the plaintiff resided. The plaintiff alleges, further, that said dog attacked him and inflicted serious and painful wounds upon his hands, arms, limbs, and body, causing him great pain and suffering, and for which he prayed damages in the sum of $1,000.
The defendant, by his answer, admitted the ownership of said dog, but denied…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Alva Roller Mills v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Security Benefit Ass'n v. LloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rhodes v. LamarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. RolandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SicklesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Allen v. CubbisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.