People v. Vaughn
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, C.J.
We granted defendant’s application for leave to appeal to determine whether defendant is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court closed the courtroom during voir dire in violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. We hold that a defendant’s right to a public trial is subject to the forfeiture rule articulated in People v Carines 2 and that the Court of Appeals erred by concluding that defendant’s failure to assert his public trial right necessarily “forecloses the later grant of relief.” 3 In applying the Carines forfeiture rule to defendant’s appeal, however, we conclude that…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by343 opinions
- People v. LockridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. SchraubenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. RussellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. SteanhouseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Martez Bickham v. Thomas WinnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
338 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.