Legal Opinion
United States v. Bansal
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 14, 2011No. 06-1370, 06-2535, 06-2536, 06-3043, 07-1525, 07-1526, 07-4618, 09-1827PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
Akhil Bansal and Frederick Mullinix appeal from their jury convictions in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on a 42-count indictment alleging crimes arising from their multi-national, internet-based, controlled-substance-distribution scheme. They have, in our estimation, challenged every decision of the District Court, at almost every moment of the litigation before, during, and after their convictions. Yet in the more than 1,100 pages of briefing submitted to us by both defendants and the government, we have…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Kaul v. ChristieDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Abigail Bacon v. Avis Budget Group IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- United States v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Erich Specht v. Google IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- The People v. Chris PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.