Legal Opinion

Kindt v. Otis Elevator Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1995No. G014202PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALLIN, J.

The trial court denied Leola Kindt’s motion under Labor Code section 3856, 1 to allocate from a workers’ compensation lien an amount for attorney fees and costs she incurred in obtaining the judgment from which the lien was satisfied. She appeals, arguing there was insufficient evidence to show the lienholder actively participated in the lawsuit resulting in the judgment. She is right; we reverse.

Kindt sustained an on-the-job injury in an elevator accident. She filed a workers’ compensation claim and received almost $20,000 in benefits. She also filed a third party personal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Crampton v. TakegoshiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Walsh v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Kavanaugh v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Walsh v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frazee v. SeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Gapusan v. JayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Collins v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Alvarado v. Kiewit Pacific Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Gapusan v. JayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API