Legal Opinion

Gapusan v. Jay

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 9, 1998No. D027546PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HALLER, J.

In this personal injury action, City of San Diego (City) intervened seeking reimbursement for workers’ compensation benefits it paid its employees, Police Officers Edmund Gapusan and Frederick McGee. (Lab. Code,1 § 3852.) We conclude the trial court violated section 3860, subdivision (b) by distributing half of the $200,000 settlement proceeds to the officers under equitable apportionment principles. We reject, however, City’s contention the error automatically entitles it to the entire settlement amount. While the court must adhere to the statutory scheme in allocating…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Phelps v. StostadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gapusan v. JayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API