Legal Opinion
Foy v. Schechter
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 1956PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
Petitioners, John Foy and Sidney Goldman, are welders. They are employed in the New York City Transit System in the position of car maintainer, group D. Foy has held his position continuously (under different titles) since June 3,1936 and Goldman since March 29,1951. The issue is whether they are to be paid at the prevailing rate of wage under section 220 of the Labor Law. Foy was one of the petitioners in the proceeding which was decided by this court in 1952, sub nom. Matter of Corrigan v. Joseph (304 N. Y. 172). Goldman was *608employed later, consequently he wag not a party. Foy, being a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gimprich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Toscano v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Corrigan v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Matter of Gaston v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Matter of Long Island R.R. Co. v. HylanNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Abiele Contracting, Inc. v. New York City School Construction AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Olson v. Board of Ed. of U. Free Sch. Dist. No. 12, Malverne, NYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
- Metropolitan Museum Historic District Coalition v. De MontebelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Mechem v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Commissioner of Labor v. HinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.