Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Forsman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 26, 1983No. 82-63PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Betty Jane Mahoney (Mahoney) filed suit against Earl Forsman, individually and doing business as Forsman Realty (Forsman); Bill Dana, individually and as agent and employee of Irvine Company, Inc. (Dana); and Irvine Company, Inc. (Irvine). She sought recovery under three causes of action in fraud. Following trial, a judgment was entered on a jury verdict against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendants. Following denial of Mahoney's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial, Mahoney appealed.

The appellant raises the following issues for our…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Resorts, Inc. v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Bedwell Lumber Co., Inc. v. T & T CORP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Earnest v. Pritchett-Moore, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Cooper v. PeturisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Underwriters Nat'l Assur. Co. v. PoseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lynn Strickland Sales & Serv., Inc. v. AERO-LANE FAB., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Christiansen v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Dodd v. Nelda Stephenson Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Deupree v. ButnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API