Legal Opinion

SOUTHERN LIFE AND HEALTH INS. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 2, 1987No. 86-71, 86-97PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a fraud case. The jury awarded Robert C. Smith, Jr., $30,000 in compensatory damages, and $35,000 in punitive damages. The trial court remitted all but $86.51 of the compensatory damages award, and the remittitur was accepted by Smith. Southern Life and Health Insurance Company appeals. Smith cross-appeals from the order remitting the compensatory damages.

The case was tried around the factual disputes of whether Smith and his wife told the agents of Southern Life that Smith's wife was pregnant or suspected that she was pregnant at the time of the taking of the application for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Torres v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Bedwell Lumber Co., Inc. v. T & T CORP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Commercial Fire Ins. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hicks v. Globe Life and Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Cock-N-Bull Steak House, Inc. v. Generali InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. ALA. DEPT. OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCESSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API