Legal Opinion

V.H. v. Estate of Birnbaum

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 16, 1996No. C0-94-1952PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

Bernard F. Birnbaum was a resident of Texas at the time of his death and his estate is being probated in Texas with ancillary proceedings in Wisconsin. Respondent, V.H., a Minnesota resident, commenced an action in district court in Minnesota against the estate of her deceased father, Bernard F. Birnbaum. In her complaint, V.H. alleged that, when she was a minor, her father engaged in unpermitted, harmful and offensive sexual contact with her. The district court dismissed V.H.’s action on the grounds that Minnesota courts lacked personal jurisdiction over her father’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  4. Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hammann v. 1-800 Ideas. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
  2. Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Griffis v. LubanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Marshall v. Inn on Madeline IslandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API