Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
The issue presented in this case is similar to the one' stated by the United States Supreme Court in its 1987 decision of As-*568ahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of California as follows:
[Wjhether the mere awareness on the part of a foreign defendant that the components it manufactured, sold, and delivered outside the United States would reach the forum State in the stream of commerce constitutes “minimum contacts” between the defendant and the forum State such that the exercise of jurisdiction “does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Nicastro v. McIntyre MacHinery America, Ltd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Ex Parte DBI, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Scott Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Bandemer v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.