Legal Opinion
In Re Application for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Ross
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 25, 2005No. 17342, 17343PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
In this proceeding, we are asked to consider a writ of error brought by the plaintiff in error Dan Ross, as father and next friend of Michael Ross, and a writ of error brought by the plaintiff in error office of the chief public defender of the state of Connecticut, as next friend of Michael B. Ross, 1 challenging the orders of the habeas court, entered on January 3, 2005, dismissing their respective petitions for writs of habeas corpus on the ground that: (1) the habeas petitions submitted by the plaintiffs in error on behalf of Michael Ross were not legitimate filings; and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rees v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Demosthenes v. BaalSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carrubba v. MoskowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- In Re Application for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Sydoriak v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Williams v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.