Legal Opinion

Estate of Parrott

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1926No. Docket No. S.F. 11663PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Mary Emilie Parrott died March 1, 1922, a resident of the county of San Mateo, this state. The fair market value of her estate was appraised by the inheritance tax appraiser at $1,301,470.69.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the appraiser should have made a deduction of $260,000, as evidenced by a joint and several promissory note made by her and her co-maker, from the market value of said estate, instead of a deduction of but one-half of said amount, to wit, $130,000, which deduction was allowed by him as a debt owing by her at the time of her demise. The appeal was taken…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riley v. HavensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. In re the Estate of LosheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Watson v. GreelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. In re the Taxable Transfer of Property of DimonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. In re Dimon's EstateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Norville v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Estate of BarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API