Legal Opinion
Harrington v. Trotman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 12, 2009No. 06-CV-1294PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Alice Harrington appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Braeden Trot-man’s claim for damages. Trotman entered into a contract with Ms. Harrington under which she would do renovation work on a house that Trotman owned. Their relationship did not end amicably, and Trotman sued Harrington, alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment, conversion, and fraud.
After a bench trial, the trial court denied all of Trotman’s claims except the equitable claim for unjust enrichment. 1 The trial court found that Trotman “has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- 4934, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Schiff v. American Ass'n of Retired PersonsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Jordan Keys & Jessamy, LLP v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Emerine v. YanceyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ingber v. RossDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- MAIA FALCONI-SACHS v. LPF SENATE SQUARE, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Kemp v. EilandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Strauss v. Newmarket Global Consulting Group, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Mica SAINT-JEAN, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DefendantDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.