Legal Opinion
Ingber v. Ross
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 20, 1984No. 82-1329, 82-1345PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Associate Judge:
These are cross-appeals by the parties, Dr. Ross and Dr. Ingber and his professional corporation, from the trial court’s judgment entered after an eight-day trial without a jury. In essence the judgment ordered (1) the rescission of certain agreements concerning the practice of dentistry into which the parties had entered for the reason that Dr. Ingber had committed a material breach, and (2) the payment by Dr. Ingber of some $70,00.0 to Dr. Ross for the consequent damages he suffered from various wrongful actions by Dr. Ingber and his corporation. Dr. Ross complains on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Alfred A. Altimont, Inc. v. Chatelain, Samperton & NolanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Moss v. StockardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Sorrells v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros., Miller & Rhoads, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Bongiovi v. SullivanNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Blodgett v. University ClubDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Henry v. HalliburtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.