Legal Opinion

Buckner v. Russell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1958No. 38169PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Justice:

This is an action by Ernest O. Russell against Thomas Buckner and wife; seeking a permanent injunction restraining defendants from trespassing upon adjoining land, removing fences, building new fences thereon and attempting to appropriate plaintiff’s land to their own use. We shall refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff and the defendants have appealed.

This controversy arose from the following facts. Defendants acquired title in 1955 to Lots 3 and 4 and the southwest of the northwest quarter of Section 1,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WhelanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Lewis v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Adams v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Shaffer v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Wilkinson v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Comstock v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. MacIas v. Guymon Industrial FoundationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Smith v. PettijohnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. McGlothlin v. LivingstonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. Moore v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API