Legal Opinion
Smith v. Pettijohn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 17, 1961No. 39265PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
Plaintiff commenced this action to permanently enjoin the defendant from interfering with her possession of certain real property. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant has perfected this appeal. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Pleadings
Plaintiff alleged that she is now and has been for more than thirty years the owner of lot 7, block 24, Waldman Addition to the City of Lawton, Oklahoma, and all the premises known as 911 South 11th street in the City of Lawton, and enclosed by a net wire fence. That the defendant entered…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. WhelanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Ellis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Walthers v. TannerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- City Nat. Bank of Duncan v. SoderbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Bennett v. GrotherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- MacIas v. Guymon Industrial FoundationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Unknown Successors of LewisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- WRT Realty, Inc. v. Boston Investment Group II, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- A+ Welding & Construction, Inc. v. BrichacekCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
- Bynum v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.