Coleman v. Drake
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Per curiam
Regulation and supervision of motor contract carriers and motor common carriers on the highways of the State is vested in the Georgia Public-Service Commission under the motor-carrier act of 1931 (Ga. L. 1931, p. 199 et seq.), and in the exercise of its supervisory and regulatory powers the commission is vested with a discretion in the promulgation of its orders. In Hudspeth v. Hall, 113 Ga. 4 (38 S. E. 358, 84 Am. St. R. 201), this court said: “The law is well settled that where public officials 'are acting within the scope of their duties and exercising a discretionary power, the courts are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hudspeth v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- McLamb v. BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- McLamb v. . BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Tomlinson v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Rogers v. Town of Black MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Statesboro Telephone Co. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.