Legal Opinion

Hudspeth v. Hall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 25, 1901PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Refusal of injunction. Before Judge Sheffield. Baker superior court. September 22, 1900.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

This case was before this court at its March term, 1900. See 111 Ga. 510. As appears from the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Little, the litigation in the trial court had resolved itself into a controversy, between Mrs. Hudspeth and R. L. Hall, concerning the right of the latter to operate a ferry over Flint river at a point a short distance below that at which she had established a public ferry. He contended that, as he was the *5owner of the land on both sides of the river at the point in question, he had a right to conduct a ferry for the accommodation of the public, notwithstanding he had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. EllermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Keen v. Mayor of WaycrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. City of Atlanta v. HollidaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. City of Atlanta v. SteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Wells v. Mayor of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cross v. Hall CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Georgia Power Co. v. Allied Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Vickers v. MotteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Partain v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Hamby & Toomer v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API