Legal Opinion
James E. McFadden, Inc. v. Baltimore Contractors, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 1, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-1905PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
James E. McFadden, Inc. (“McFadden”) brought this diversity action against several defendants to recover monies allegedly due it for construction work performed as a subcontractor at the Limerick Generating Station Project. Named as the principal defendants were Bechtel Power Corporation (“Bechtel”), the general contractor, Baltimore Contractors, Inc. (“Baltimore”), the contractor with whom McFadden entered into the subcontract agreement, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (“USF & G”), a bonding company. A default judgment was entered against…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Patricia A. Hollinger, Administratrix of the Estate of Germaine S. Hollinger, Deceased v. Wagner Mining Equipment Company, a Division of Paccar, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Kenneth BodieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Krivo Industrial Supply Company and Morgan Precision Parts, Inc. v. National Distillers and Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Botwinick v. Credit Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Forest Hill Corp. v. Latter & Blum, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Irwin & Leighton, Inc. v. W.M. Anderson Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
- Temp-Way Corp. v. Continental BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Ragan v. Tri-County Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Howard Oaks, Inc. v. Maryland National BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1993
- In Re iPCS, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.